Ingrediëntenlijst

Home › Biscuits, sweets & chocolate › Biscuits

Smaakt Cranberrykoeken

Smaakt · 250 g

At Albert Heijn€ 3,49PLUS€ 3,49

Go to: Allergens · Ingredients · Nutrition · Price history

Allergens 3

Contains gluten
1 alternative without gluten on the same shelf ↓

Not on the label: milk, egg, peanut and soy

What does ‘may contain traces of tree nuts’ mean?

Ingredients 17

Wholemeal wheat flour, Palm oil (Non-hydrogenated), Oat flakes, Gezoete en gedroogde cranberries (Cranberries, Appeldiksap, Sunflower oil), Rice syrup, Maïsmoutstroop, Kokosbloesemsiroop, Gerstemoutstroop, Wheat bran, Raising agent (Sodium bicarbonate), Cinnamon, Salt, =biologisch kan sporen bevatten van andere glutenbevattende granen, Nuts

  1. Wholemeal wheat flour Volkoren tarwemeel (gluten)40%
  2. Palm oil Palmolie: Non-hydrogenated Ongehard
  3. Oat flakes Havervlokken (gluten)
  4. Gezoete en gedroogde cranberries: Cranberries 60%, Appeldiksap, Sunflower oil Zonnebloemolie10%
  5. Rice syrup Rijststroop
  6. Maïsmoutstroop
  7. Kokosbloesemsiroop
  8. Gerstemoutstroop (gluten)
  9. Wheat bran Tarwezemelen (gluten)2%
  10. Raising agent Rijsmiddel: Sodium bicarbonate Natrium bicarbonaat
  11. Cinnamon Kaneel
  12. Salt Zout
  13. Nuts Noten (tree nuts)
  14. Sesame seeds Sesamzaad (sesame)
The label as printed (Dutch)

Ingrediënten: Volkoren TARWEmeel* 40%, palmolie* (ongehard), HAVERvlokken*, gezoete en gedroogde cranberries* 10% (cranberries* 60%, appeldiksap*, zonnebloemolie*), rijststroop*, maïsmoutstroop*, kokosbloesemsiroop*, GERSTEmoutstroop*, TARWEzemelen* 2%, rijsmiddel: natrium bicarbonaat, kaneel*, zout, *=biologisch Kan sporen bevatten van andere glutenbevattende granen, noten, sesamzaad.

Label from Albert Heijn · last seen on 4 November 2026. Recipes change: read the pack. The shop gives the label in Dutch only: each ingredient is translated, with the Dutch word from the pack beside it in grey.

This label names palm oil. What each is and what else it is in: on its own page.

Nutrition

  • Energy473kcal
  • Fat21 ghigh
  • Sugars19 gmedium
  • Salt0.2 glow

Per 100 g. Low, medium or high by the UK traffic-light levels.

High in fibre and protein, low in sugars and salt for this shelf

Nutrientper 100 gper 22 g
Energy473.0 kcal104.0 kcal
Fat21.0 g4.6 g
of which saturates9.5 g2.1 g
Carbohydrate61.0 g13.0 g
of which sugars19.0 g4.2 g
Fibre6.6 g1.5 g
Protein6.7 g1.5 g
Salt0.24 g0.05 g

Compared with the shelf

Per 100 g, beside 52 products on the shelf ‘Everyday biscuits’.

  • Energy473 kcalaround the middle
  • Saturated fat9,5 gless than 62%
  • Sugars19 gless than 96%
  • Salt0,24 gless than 83%
  • Fibre6,6 gmore than 90%
  • Protein6,7 gmore than 79%

Nutri-Score D · Given by Albert Heijn. Nutri-Score compares products of one kind and says nothing about allergens.

Our own calculation: D. How it comes about

Negative points

  • Energy+5
  • Sugars+5
  • Saturated fat+9
  • Salt+1

Positive points

  • Protein0
  • Fibre−4
  • Fruit, vegetables, pulses (10%)0

Total 16 points: Nutri-Score D

Prices

Everywhere € 3,49 · € 13,96 per kg

Albert HeijnAHPLUS€ 3,49Same price everywhere

Product details

Barcode
8719153021320The number under the bars, the same in every shop.
Shop category
Biscuits, sweets, chocolate › Everyday biscuits
Name per shop
  • Albert Heijn: Smaakt Cranberrykoeken
  • PLUS: Smaakt Koeken cranberry en kokos bio

Price history

Now € 3,49 at Albert Heijn · unchanged since 1 September 2026

Now € 3,49 at Albert Heijn · unchanged since 1 September 2026

The price history appears here.

Product details

Barcode
8719153021320The number under the bars, the same in every shop.
Shop category
Biscuits, sweets, chocolate › Everyday biscuits
Name per shop
  • Albert Heijn: Smaakt Cranberrykoeken
  • PLUS: Smaakt Koeken cranberry en kokos bio

Alternatives

Without gluten, on the same shelf

Without gluten, on the same shelf

More choice on this shelf

Lists, in Dutch, with every product’s ingredients; the number is how many are on it.

Without what this contains

Other choices for everyday biscuits

Something wrong?