Ingrediëntenlijst

Home › Cold cuts & tapas › Chicken, roast beef & smoked beef

PLUS Puur van smaak rosbief peper

PLUS Puur van smaak · 100 gram

At PLUS€ 3,69

Go to: Allergens · Ingredients · Nutrition · Price history

Allergens

No allergens

PLUS declares no allergens, and the ingredient list names none. Read off the label: if in doubt, check the packaging.

No allergens on the label

Ingredients 2

  1. Beef Rundvlees99%
  2. Pepper Peper1%
The label as printed (Dutch)

99% Rundvlees, 1% peper.

Label from PLUS · last seen on 4 November 2026. Recipes change: read the pack. The shop gives the label in Dutch only: each ingredient is translated, with the Dutch word from the pack beside it in grey.

Nutrition

  • Energy162kcal
  • Fat4.7 gmedium
  • Sugars0.1 glow
  • Salt0.2 glow

Per 100 g. Low, medium or high by the UK traffic-light levels.

Nutrientper 100 g
Energy162.0 kcal
Fat4.7 g
of which saturates1.5 g
of which mono-unsaturates1.8 g
of which polyunsaturates0.8 g
of which trans fat0.1 g
Carbohydrate0.5 g
of which sugars0.1 g
of which added sugars0.0 g
of which polyols0.0 g
of which starch0.4 g
Fibre0.0 g
Protein29.5 g
Salt0.19 g
Sodium0.076 g

Nutri-Score B · Given by PLUS. Nutri-Score compares products of one kind and says nothing about allergens.

Our own calculation: B. How it comes about

Negative points

  • Energy+2
  • Sugars0
  • Saturated fat+1
  • Salt0

Positive points

  • Protein−2
  • Fibre0
  • Fruit, vegetables, pulses0

Total 1 points: Nutri-Score B

Prices

€ 3,69 at PLUS · € 36,90 per kg

PLUS€ 3,69

Product details

Barcode
2363989000000The number under the bars, the same in every shop.
Shop category
Vleeswaren, broodsalades › Carpaccio, rookvlees, rundvlees

Price history

Now € 3,69 at PLUS · unchanged since 1 September 2026

Now € 3,69 at PLUS · unchanged since 1 September 2026

The price history appears here.

Product details

Barcode
2363989000000The number under the bars, the same in every shop.
Shop category
Vleeswaren, broodsalades › Carpaccio, rookvlees, rundvlees

Something wrong?