Ingrediëntenlijst

Home › Fruit & vegetables › Potatoes

Biologisch PLUS Vastkokende aardappelen

Biologisch PLUS · 1 kg

At PLUS€ 2,29

Pack of Biologisch PLUS Vastkokende aardappelen
Photo: Open Food Facts, CC BY-SA

Go to: Allergens · Ingredients · Nutrition · Price history

Allergens

No allergens

PLUS declares no allergens, and the ingredient list names none. Read off the label: if in doubt, check the packaging.

No allergens on the label

Ingredients 1

  1. Aardappelen van biologische oorspong
The label as printed (Dutch)

ingrediënten :aardappelen* *van biologische oorspong

Label from PLUS · last seen on 4 November 2026. Recipes change: read the pack. The shop gives the label in Dutch only: each ingredient is translated, with the Dutch word from the pack beside it in grey.

Nutrition

  • Energy88kcal
  • Fat0 glow
  • Sugars1 glow
  • Salt0 glow

Per 100 g. Low, medium or high by the UK traffic-light levels.

Nutrientper 100 g
Energy88.0 kcal
Fat0.0 g
of which saturates0.0 g
of which mono-unsaturates0.0 g
of which polyunsaturates0.0 g
Carbohydrate19.0 g
of which sugars1.0 g
of which added sugars0.0 g
Fibre1.8 g
Protein2.0 g
Salt0.005 g
Sodium0.002 g

Nutri-Score A · Given by PLUS. Nutri-Score compares products of one kind and says nothing about allergens.

Our own calculation: A. How it comes about

Negative points

  • Energy+1
  • Sugars0
  • Saturated fat0
  • Salt0

Positive points

  • Protein0
  • Fibre0
  • Fruit, vegetables, pulses (100%)−5

Total -4 points: Nutri-Score A

Prices

€ 2,29 at PLUS · € 2,29 per kg

PLUS€ 2,29

Product details

Barcode
8710624373924The number under the bars, the same in every shop.
Shop category
Potatoes, vegetables, fruit › Ongeschilde aardappelen

Price history

Now € 2,29 at PLUS · higher than on 1 September 2026

Now € 2,29 at PLUS · higher than on 1 September 2026

The price history appears here.

Product details

Barcode
8710624373924The number under the bars, the same in every shop.
Shop category
Potatoes, vegetables, fruit › Ongeschilde aardappelen

Something wrong?