Ingrediëntenlijst

Home › Household & pets › Cat treats

Whiskas Sticks - Rund - Kattensnack - 3 Stuks

Go to: Allergens · Ingredients · Price history

Allergens

Not declared

The shop declares no allergens: read the label

Ingredients 7

  1. Meat and animal derivatives Vlees en dierlijke bijproducten: Totaal 90%, Waarvan rund 26%
  2. Yeast Gist
  3. Sugars Suikers
  4. Vegetable derivatives Plantaardige bijproducten
  5. Minerals Mineralen
  6. Herbs Kruiden
The label as printed (Dutch)

Vlees en dierlijke bijproducten (totaal 90%, waarvan 26% rund), gist, suikers, plantaardige bijproducten, mineralen, kruiden

Label from Jumbo · last seen on 28 October 2026. Recipes change: read the pack. The shop gives the label in Dutch only: each ingredient is translated, with the Dutch word from the pack beside it in grey.

Prices

Cheapest at Hoogvliet: € 1,64 · € 91,11 per kg

Hoogvliet€ 1,64Cheapest
Jumbo€ 1,69+ € 0,05
Albert HeijnAHPLUS€ 1,75+ € 0,11

Product details

Barcode
4008429123597The number under the bars, the same in every shop.
Shop category
Household and pets › Cat treats
Name per shop
  • Hoogvliet: Sticks rundvlees
  • Jumbo: Whiskas Sticks - Rund - Kattensnack - 3 Stuks
  • Albert Heijn: Whiskas Sticks rund kattensnacks
  • PLUS: Whiskas Sticks Rund Kattensnack

Price history

Now € 1,64 at Hoogvliet · higher than on 1 September 2026

Now € 1,64 at Hoogvliet · higher than on 1 September 2026

The price history appears here.

Product details

Barcode
4008429123597The number under the bars, the same in every shop.
Shop category
Household and pets › Cat treats
Name per shop
  • Hoogvliet: Sticks rundvlees
  • Jumbo: Whiskas Sticks - Rund - Kattensnack - 3 Stuks
  • Albert Heijn: Whiskas Sticks rund kattensnacks
  • PLUS: Whiskas Sticks Rund Kattensnack

Alternatives

Lists for the shelves this product is on, each with every product's ingredients (in Dutch)

More choice on this shelf

Lists, in Dutch, with every product’s ingredients; the number is how many are on it.

Other choices for cat treats

Something wrong?